Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kenny

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 10, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Foreclosure.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

This is an appeal from a decree foreclosing a trust deed.

August 6, 1894, appellant executed to her own order a promissory note for the sum of $2,250, due five years after said date, with semi-annual interest at the rate of seven per cent per annum, and also ten interest notes or coupons, also payable to her own order, for the semi-annual interest to become due on said principal note, for $78.75 each, and payable, the first coupon note February 6, 1895, the second August 6, 1895, and so alternately on said days in the months and years in which the remainder of said coupon notes would fall due.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Gage v. PerryIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Jones v. Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Nickerson v. RockwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Glos v. FurmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Straus v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  2. Petty v. BeersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API