Legal Opinion
Mahopac National Bank v. Baisley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 17, 1997PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to foreclose a mortgage on certain real property, the *467defendants Timothy Baisley and Roger W. Simpson appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated September 25, 1996, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff bank sustained its initial burden of demonstrating its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting proof of the existence of the mortgage and the appellants’ default in payment (see, Home Sav. Bank v Schorr Bros. Dev. Corp., 213 AD2d 512; Zitel Corp. v…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nassau Trust Co. v. Montrose Concrete Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Home Savings Bank v. Schorr Bros. Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Pellicane v. Norstar BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Zitel Corp. v. Fonar Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Fleet Mortgage Corp. v. RebichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by42 opinions
- Midfirst Bank v. AghoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. WebsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Citibank, N.A. v. Van Brunt Properties, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Hoffman v. KrausAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Capstone Business Credit, LLC v. Imperia Family Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.