Richardson v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the District Court of Limestone. Tried below before the Hon. D. M. Prendergast. The material facts will be found in the opinion. With their verdict of guilty, the jury awarded the accused three years’ employment in the penitentiary.
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
The appellant was indicted under Article 2426, Paschal’s Digest, for swindling by obtaining goods under false pretenses and fraudulent representations. The fraudulent representations consisted in the fact that he piny chased goods upon the faith and credit of,one George Andrews, upon the false pretense that he had the right to do so upon the authority of the said Andrews. There is, perhaps, more repetition and tautology in the indictment than was necessary, but we are of opinion that it will be found good when tested by the precedents and authorities. Johnson v. The State, 41 Texas, 65; The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cline v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1875
- Johnson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Washington v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Wright v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Epperson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.