Legal Opinion
In re Mendelson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 13, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, First Department, in 1972. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the Town of Delhi, Delaware County.
Having granted petitioner’s motion for an order declaring that no factual issues are raised by the pleadings (see 22 NYCRR 806.5) and having heard respondent in mitigation, we now find respondent guilty of the professional misconduct charged in the petition. Respondent converted client funds in violation of this Court’s attorney disciplinary rules (see Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 [a] [5], [7]; DR 9-102…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re ReaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re JensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re DiMaggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re MendelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re MendelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re MendelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- MatterofMendelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014