Legal Opinion

Grigsby v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 26, 1935No. Docket No. 76436Published

Where taxpayer, because of the provisions of a certain "underwriting agreement" in which he participated as a principal, actually purchased his allocable part of the underwritten stock from the issuing corporation, held, the transaction was a mere purchase of the stock by the taxpayer and no loss was sustained upon such acquisition.

1Opinion of the Court

BERTRAM J. GRIGSBY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Grigsby v. Commissioner

Docket No. 76436.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

33 B.T.A. 568; 1935 BTA LEXIS 737;

November 26, 1935, Promulgated

Where taxpayer, because of the provisions of a certain "underwriting agreement" in which he participated as a principal, actually purchased his allocable part of the underwritten stock from the issuing corporation, held, the transaction was a mere purchase of the stock by the taxpayer and no loss was sustained upon such acquisition.

Edward H. McDermott, Esq., and Marvin P. Kahl,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grigsby v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API