Jewett v. Bowman
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill, amended bill, answers, and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
The Yice-Chancellok.
This action is brought by the receiver of the Erie Railway Company against a person who, until just before its commencement, was his purchasing agent, and, also, against Sigmund Dringer, a dealer in old metals, who, at its commencement, was engaged in business at Paterson. The bill presents a case of fraud. In my view, the only question necessary to be considered in deciding it is, has the complainant proved the frauds charged against the defendants or either of them. The question is one of fact exclusively. .No legal rules are in dispute, and none need be considered…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Faris v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1827
- Greisner v. GreisnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burdick v. GrimshawNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933