Ramirez v. Walmart
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Crothers, Justice.
[¶ 1] David Ramirez appeals from an order dismissing his retaliatory discharge action against Walmart without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We affirm, concluding the order is appealable and the district court did not err in dismissing Ramirez's retaliatory discharge claim on the pleadings.
I
[¶ 2] Ramirez was employed by Walmart in Jamestown. On April 18, 2017 Walmart terminated Ramirez's employment. On October 13, 2017 Ramirez sued Walmart under N.D.C.C § 34-01-20, which prohibits retaliatory discharges by employers. Ramirez…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Trade 'N Post, L.L.C. v. World Duty Free Americas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Dahlberg v. LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERV. OF NDNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Vandall v. Trinity HospitalsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Brandvold v. Lewis & Clark Public School District 161North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- James Vault & Precast Co. v. B&B Hot Oil Service, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cichos v. Dakota Eye Institute, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Burr v. N.D. State Board of Dental ExaminersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Burr v. N.D. State Board of Dental ExaminersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Cichos v. Dakota Eye Institute, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019