Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. Walmart

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2018No. 20180027PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

[¶ 1] David Ramirez appeals from an order dismissing his retaliatory discharge action against Walmart without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We affirm, concluding the order is appealable and the district court did not err in dismissing Ramirez's retaliatory discharge claim on the pleadings.

I

[¶ 2] Ramirez was employed by Walmart in Jamestown. On April 18, 2017 Walmart terminated Ramirez's employment. On October 13, 2017 Ramirez sued Walmart under N.D.C.C § 34-01-20, which prohibits retaliatory discharges by employers. Ramirez…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trade 'N Post, L.L.C. v. World Duty Free Americas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Dahlberg v. LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERV. OF NDNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Vandall v. Trinity HospitalsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Brandvold v. Lewis & Clark Public School District 161North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. James Vault & Precast Co. v. B&B Hot Oil Service, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cichos v. Dakota Eye Institute, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Burr v. N.D. State Board of Dental ExaminersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Burr v. N.D. State Board of Dental ExaminersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Cichos v. Dakota Eye Institute, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API