Legal Opinion

In re Thompson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1987No. 16775PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This matter is before the Court after disciplinary proceedings wherein attorney Rogan Thompson agreed not to contest allegations that he had engaged in various acts of misconduct. On condition that Thompson receive as a sanction an indefinite period of suspension of not less than five years, the Court adopts the recommendations of the Disciplinary Board and accepts the stipulations agreed to by Thompson and disciplinary counsel.

The uncontested facts concern business transactions wherein Thompson was entrusted with large sums of money by several individuals.

In one transaction, Thompson…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of AyalaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Matter of DuffyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Matter of StewartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API