Legal Opinion
Kinark Corp. v. Camelot, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 14, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-1364PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BROTMAN, District Judge.
This is an action for service mark infringement and unfair competition. Claims for relief are pleaded under §§ 32(1) and 43(a) of the Lanham Act of 1946, as amended (hereinafter, “the Lanham Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(1), 1125(a), as well as under the common law. Plaintiffs claim to be the owners of two federally registered service marks, CAMELOT INN and CAMELOT, which they have used in connection with hotels in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and Little Rock, Arkansas. Defendant Camelot, Inc., has undertaken steps to build and operate the Camelot…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Amstar Corporation v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. And Atlanta Pizza, Inc., Pizza Enterprises, Inc. And Pizza Services, Inc., Hanna Creative Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Union Carbide Corporation v. Ever-Ready Incorporated, a Corporation, and Mark Gilbert, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Scott Paper Company, a Corporation v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- La Quinta Worldwide LLC v. Q.R.T.M., S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Cullman Ventures, Inc. v. Columbian Art Works, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Warner Lambert Co. v. McCrory's Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Andy Warhol Enterprises, Inc. v. Time Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Holiday Inns, Inc. v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.