Legal Opinion

Miller v. Meilstrup

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1906No. Docket No. 90PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Arenac; Sharpe, J. Bill by Floyd D. Miller against James S. Meilstrup and Anna J. Meilstrup to compel a reconveyance of certain real estate, and to quiet title thereto. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The questions involved in this case are so clearly stated by the circuit judge in his written opinion -that we insert it here:

“ The facts in this case, as conceded, or, in my opinion, ¡established by competent proof, are as follows:
“1. That on April 26, 1902, the complainant purchased at the auditor general’s office the State bid for the taxes of 1898 on the lands in, question herein. That at that time the taxes of 1899, 1900, and 1901, were delinquent *644and unpaid. That complainant received a tax deed by virtue of such purchase on the 9th day of August, 1902, but the same was not recorded by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boucher v. TrembleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. White v. Panama Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API