Legal Opinion

People v. Heng Sem

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 2014No. H039252PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GROVER, J.

I. Introduction

In this appeal we consider how long a term of probation can be extended to compel payment of victim restitution from a probationer who was unable to pay $60,422 in full during her original three-year term of probation.

Restitution for crime victims was recognized as a California constitutional right in 1982. Since 1983, Penal Code section 1203.2, subdivision (a) 1 has provided that restitution shall be consistent with a probationer’s ability to pay and that probation cannot be revoked for nonpayment of restitution “unless the court determines that the defendant…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. KaaneheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Anaya CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. People v. Johnson CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. People v. Patterson CA5California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. Todd CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API