Legal Opinion

James J. Condit and Rose Marie Condit v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 17, 1964No. 15299_1PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented here concerns the right of a taxpayer, employed as an accountant by two affiliated industrial concerns, in computing his income tax, to take a deduction from income of expenditures he incurred for tuition, textbooks and necessary supplies in attending night law school. He graduated from the law school and was admitted to the bar in Ohio. Thereafter, he continued to work for the same employers. The deduction was claimed as an ordinary and necessary business expense of carrying on a trade or business under Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. (26 U.S.C. § 162)

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bodley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  2. Ephraim Cross and Mary Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  3. Baker v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  4. Martin J. Welsh and Elsie N. Welsh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  5. Ramon M. Greenberg v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API