Jackson v. Sacramento Valley Railroad
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.
This is an action against the defendants, as common carriers, for the value of certain goods received by them as such, and which it is alleged they failed to deliver to the plaintiff. The case was tried by a jury, who, under the direction of the Court, found the following special verdict: “ 1st. Were the packages of goods in question in this suit, at the depdt of defendants, among other packages of the plaintiffs at the time the agent of plaintiffs signed the receipts for the same ? Answer: No. 2d. Were the packages in question delivered to and received by the agent of plaintiffs? Answer: No.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wright v. WhitesidesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by8 opinions
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Logan, Snow & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Francis v. Dubuque & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Jenne v. BurgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Lamb v. Camden & Amboy Railroad & Transportation Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1869
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.