Donald Kalish v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
We affirm the action of the district court in granting appellee’s motion to dismiss.
This case involves a claim for refund of Federal Excise Tax in the amount of $4.92 paid by the appellant for telephone service, because he claims that the taxing statute (Tax Adjustment Act of 1966, P.L. 89-368, 80 Stat. 38, 66, § 202(a)) is unconstitutional in that Congress was motivated to enact the statute to raise funds for use in the Vietnamese war effort. From that platform appellant launches an attack on the constitutionality of the Vietnam war. We do not reach the constitutional questions, because…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Robert Luftig v. Robert S. McNamara Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- United States v. John Nelson HogansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
3Cited by35 opinions
- Neila A. Autenrieth v. Joseph M. Cullen, District Director of IrsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Russell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
- Greenberg v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- Egnal v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
- Scheide v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.