Williams v. Shell Oil Co.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND AND DENYING MOTION TO TRANSFER 1
RHOADES, District Judge.
On June 8, 1994, twelve cases concerning polybutylene plumbing systems were removed from state court to the District Court for the Southern District of California by defendant Hoechst Celanese Corporation (“Celanese”). Two days later, on June 10, Plaintiffs Robert L. and Nancy K. Williams (“Williams”) filed an ex parte Motion to Remand. 2 A hearing was held, and discovery issues were addressed. The Motion to Remand was joined by Plaintiffs Sunset Ridge Owners Association, Inc., et al., Defendant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- In Re American Hardwoods, Inc., Debtor. American Hardwoods, Inc. v. Deutsche Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Robinson v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Paul v. Chemical Bank (In Re 666 Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Southmark Corp. v. Coopers & LybrandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Christo v. PadgettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Personette v. Kennedy (In Re Midgard Corp.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp. v. Hayes (In Re Hayes)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 1999
- Citigroup, Inc. v. Pacific Investment Management Co. (In Re Enron Corp.)District Court, C.D. California · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.