Peter Desimone, John Stepich, Harold Hopkins v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Stepich and Hopkins were indicted with three other defendants, Desimone, Felton and DePierris by a grand jury in the Western District of Washington, for conspiring to commit lan offense against the United States in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 3253, which reads:
“Any person who shall carry on the business of * * * retail liquor dealer * * * and willfully fails to pay the special tax as required by law, shall * * * be fined * * * and be imprisoned •X* -X* -X* »>
There was a trial before The Honor'able John Bowen, sitting without a jury |by consent of…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Robert L. Strauss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Robert Lee JamersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Samuel C. CashioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Wayne M. Greiser, United States of America v. Roderick J. Monte, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. James G. BlackwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.