Legal Opinion

Peter Desimone, John Stepich, Harold Hopkins v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 25, 1955No. 14398_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.

Appellants Stepich and Hopkins were indicted with three other defendants, Desimone, Felton and DePierris by a grand jury in the Western District of Washington, for conspiring to commit lan offense against the United States in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 3253, which reads:

“Any person who shall carry on the business of * * * retail liquor dealer * * * and willfully fails to pay the special tax as required by law, shall * * * be fined * * * and be imprisoned •X* -X* -X* »>

There was a trial before The Honor'able John Bowen, sitting without a jury |by consent of…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Robert L. Strauss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. United States v. Robert Lee JamersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Samuel C. CashioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. Wayne M. Greiser, United States of America v. Roderick J. Monte, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. James G. BlackwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API