Braly v. Seaman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The following-is a copy of the assessment roll for the year 1861-62, so far as it refers to the lot in dispute. Of like ‘-'character were the assessments for the other years for which tax deeds had been given : BLOCK NO. 128. FISCAL YEAR 1861-62. DESCRIPTION OP PROPERTY. REFERENCE BOOK. LOT NO. NAMES OF OWNERS OR CLAIMANTS.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The following-is a copy of the assessment roll for the year 1861-62, so far as it refers to the lot in dispute. Of like ‘-'character were the assessments for the other years for which tax deeds had been given : BLOCK NO. 128. FISCAL YEAR 1861-62. DESCRIPTION OP PROPERTY. REFERENCE BOOK. LOT NO. NAMES OF OWNERS OR CLAIMANTS. This property is assessed to the parties listed, and to all owners and claimants known or unknown, and to all owners and claimants of any interest, present or future therein, or…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Currey, C. J.:
Ejectment for the undivided half of Fifty Vara Lot Number Five Hundred and Thirteen in the City of San Francisco.
On the 12th of May, 1848, George Hyde was the owner of the lot mentioned, and on that day conveyed it to James D. Curl and John W. Jenkins. On the 26th of December, 1850, James D. Curl conveyed the undivided half of the same lot to Robert A. Curl, who afterwards, on the 6th of February, 1865, conveyed his estate and interest therein to the plaintiff. Since the 1st of August, 1862, Joseph H. Moore has been the owner of the other undivided half of the lot,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jordan v. GiblinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Reed v. SpicerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Harding v. GillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Tidd v. RinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Columbia Screw Co. v. Warner Lock Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Nicoll Et Ux. v. Midland Savings Loan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.