Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 28, 1966PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

This appeal presents the question whether a tort-feasor has such “interest” in the appointment of a guardian for an infant injured by the tort as would empower him to appeal an order of the county court removing the guardian.

Appellant Brill Stuart, son of appellant John Stuart, while participating in a high school track meet in Barren County, struck and injured Marlene Montayne, another participant, with a shot-put.

Marlene Montayne was abandoned years before the injury by her natural parents. Since the time of abandonment, she has lived with the Reverend T. A. Richardson and his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Farmers BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. Riedinger v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Earle v. CobbKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Harris v. JacksonKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Miller v. Paducah Airport Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  4. MATTER OF ESTATE OF DeVOSSSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  5. Acuff v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API