Legal Opinion

Jones v. Barry

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 25, 2002No. 01-2092PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff-appellant Maceo Jones, an inmate appearing pro se, appeals the district court’s interlocutory order, designated as a final judgment for appeal pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b), dismissing most of the claims asserted in his amended civil rights complaint. We exercise…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Curley v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. Perkins v. Kansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Country Chrysler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Richard Atchinson v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. Holland Ex Rel. Overdorff v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kennington v. United States Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Alberto Borrego v. Core Civic, et al.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2018
  3. Davis v. Buchanan County, MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019
  4. Dawson v. RiosDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
  5. Jackson v. BeswickDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API