Legal Opinion
Claim of Clohesy v. Consolidated Edison Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 12, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Peters, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 15, 2001, which ruled that claimant had voluntarily withdrawn from the labor market.
Claimant began working for the employer, a utility company, in 1961. Prior to resigning from his employment on December 1, 1999, he filed three claims for workers’ compensation benefits. The first arose out of a motor vehicle accident in June 1979 while claimant was working as a field analyst. The case was established for injuries to claimant’s back and neck and he was classified as permanently partially disabled. The second…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Camarda v. New York TelephoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Claim of Curtis v. Dale Pipery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Evans v. Jewish Home & HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Claim of Milby v. Consolidated EdisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Singletary v. Meloon FoundriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gennes v. Longwood Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Matter of Vankoevering v. New York State Canal Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Claim of O'Shea v. Initial Cleaning ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004