Legal Opinion

Samuel Shibli Haddad v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 25, 1965No. 19890_1PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

Haddad was convicted by a jury under an indictment, the material part of which ■ reads as follows:

“The Grand Jury charges:

[18 U.S.C. § 1001]

On or about May 29, 1963, in Los Angeles County, within the Central Division of the Southern District of California, defendant SAMUEL SHIBLI HADDAD, in a matter within the jurisdiction of, and material to the Department of State, a department and agency of the United States knowingly and wilfully prepared and caused to be prepared a letter addressed to the American Consul, at Amman, Jordan, which letter related to one Mosa D. Abu…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. BramblettSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Perez v. BrownellSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Bugajewitz v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Inmon, Martel A/K/A MartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. LorenzoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Shaffer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. United States v. Clayton E. ScottCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. ReedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API