Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Tunstall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered July 25, 2001, which, in effect, denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The Supreme Court’s certification order dated March 30, 2000, had the same effect as a duly served 90-day notice (see Doyle v South Nassau Communities Hosp., 270 AD2d 225). To avoid a default pursuant to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Werbin v. LociceroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Rubin v. BaglioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Keating v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  4. Lopez v. Pathmark Supermarket, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Hogan v. City of KingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dhaliwal v. Long Boat Taxi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API