Legal Opinion
Boykin & Tayloe, Inc. v. Columbia Fire Ins.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 10, 1950No. 977PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYAN, District Judge.
Cross motions for summary judgment present the question whether the defendant insurer through estoppel or perhaps waiver is barred from relying upon the value reporting clause of its monthly reporting fire insurance policy, issued to the plaintiff, to limit the latter’s recovery for loss to “not more than the amounts included in the last report of values”, that clause reading: “9. Value Reporting Clause. It is a condition of this policy that .the insured shall report.to this Company not later than thirty (30) days after the last day of each month, the exact location of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Virginia Auto Mutual Insurance v. BrillhartSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
- Peters v. Great American Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Camilla Feed Mills, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Columbia Fire Ins. Co. v. Boykin & Tayloe, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Filippo Industries, Inc. v. Sun Insurance Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Progressive Enterprises, Inc. v. New England Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Progressive Enterprises, Inc. v. New England Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976