Sarkisian v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to the Denver District Court. — Hon. Harry C. Riddle, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garrigues
1. Defendant was convicted of violating the statute which, so far as applicable to this case, provides: That every person who shall use or attempt to use any instrument with the intention to procure a miscarriage of any woman then being with child shall be punished, etc., M. A. S., Rev. Ed. 1912, sec. 1775. The information, omitting formal parts, charges: ‘ ‘ That T. Sarkisian on, to-wit, the 28th day of October, A. D. 1911, at the city and county of Denver, state of Colorado, did then and there unlawfully, feloniously and maliciously use and cause to be used a certain instrument and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. OlmsteadMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- McQueary v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Cochran v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Robinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roberts v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Schraeder v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Highley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- Richey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Roberts v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938