Seminole Title & Ins. v. Parker
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentEd. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice
I respectfully dissent from the reversal. By the rule known as “Law of the Case,” the Chancery. Court rendered the only decree that it could have rendered under the directions of this Court.
The majority opinion commences with the sentence: “This is the second appearance of this case before us.” So, the majority recognizes that the present case of Seminole v. Parker is the same case as Parker v. Seminole, et al. The former case in this Court was No. 1254, and the original transcript in that case shows that the appellants were D. C. Parker and Anita Parker, his wife; and the appellees in that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ellis Lewis v. WarnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Storthz v. FullertonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- National Surety Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- American Railway Express Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Hutson Motor Company v. LakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936