Legal Opinion

O'Loughlin v. Bay State Street Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 19, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

The plaintiff asserts that she was injured at a point on East Merrimack Street in Lowell, about twenty-five feet westerly from a spur track of the Boston and Maine Railroad which crosses the highway at grade, while attempting to board an open car belonging to the defendant, by reason of the car starting forward with an unusual jerk while she had “one foot on the running board and was about to place the other on the floor of the car.” Her evidence tended to show that she gave a signal to the conductor to stop, while she was standing at a regular stopping place, that the conductor gave the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Martin v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Sauvan v. Citizens' Electric Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Vine v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Benoit v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gorman v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Board of Commissioners v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Nuttall v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Rogers v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API