Legal Opinion

People v. Flynn

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 18, 2004No. 3-03-0990, 3-03-0991, 3-03-0992, 3-03-0993 Cons. RelPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schmidt

The defendant, Patrick Flynn, was charged by indictment with several offenses, including five counts of business transaction fraud. 815 ILCS 5/12(J)(2) (West 2000). He moved to dismiss the business transaction fraud counts, claiming that the indictment was insufficient because it did not include the required mental state for those offenses. The trial court granted defendant’s motion. On appeal, the State contends that: (1) the trial court erred in considering the motion to dismiss because it was not timely filed; and (2) the court erred in granting the motion because the indictment adequately…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. DiLorenzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. MeyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. MeyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Marriage of StinauerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  2. In re Marriage of StinauerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API