Legal Opinion

Smith v. Abair

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Edget, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcG-rath, J.

This cause was commenced in justice’s court, and appealed to the' circuit court, where plaintiff had judgment.

The defendant, who was marshal of the village of Carrollton, received a tax warrant running against plaintiff’s wife, for the collection of a tax amounting to $31 or $33, and under this warrant he seized and took away a long list of articles of personal wearing apparel belonging to Mrs. Smith. Some of this had been purchased by her prior to the marriage, and others had been purchased after marriage, in the ordinary course of purchases by the wife.1 The replevin is brought by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curtis v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Hawkins v. Providence & Worcester RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. State v. HatsIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farrow v. FarrowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  2. Semple School for Girls v. YieldingAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Withey v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Mains v. Webber's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API