Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wright v. Casey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 6, 1955No. 5-702PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. SeaborN Holt, J.

This appeal involves the question of the right of the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission to adopt rules and regulations for the conservation and regulation of wildlife in Arkansas. Specifically the question is whether the Commission could promulgate a rule to require a license fee of $1.50 on each hound dog used for chasing foxes for pleasure, and also a penalty for failure to comply.

The question arose in this manner: Appellee Chester Casey was on March 31, 1954, charged in a Justice of the Peace Court with the offense of hunting foxes with a fox hound without first having- procured a license…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. W. R. Wrape Stave Co. v. Arkansas State Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Chaffin v. Arkansas Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Farris v. Ark. State Game & Fish Comm.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Arkansas State Game & Fish Commission v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Dennis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  5. State v. BickerstaffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API