State v. Neville
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Judge.
On appeal defendant argues: (1) his guilty plea to uttering is a nullity because he never formally waived his right to a Bill of Indictment, and he was never indicted for uttering; and (2) the sentencing court erred in failing to find as a mitigating factor that the relationship between defendant and victim was an extenuating circumstance.
I
Defendant pled guilty to uttering a forged instrument pursuant to a plea agreement and a Bill of Information which was signed by the prosecutor. Neither defendant nor his attorney signed the waiver of a Bill of Indictment attached to the Bill…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- McClure v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. BillingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. KelsoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.