Legal Opinion

State v. Neville

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1992No. 9115SC828PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Judge.

On appeal defendant argues: (1) his guilty plea to uttering is a nullity because he never formally waived his right to a Bill of Indictment, and he was never indicted for uttering; and (2) the sentencing court erred in failing to find as a mitigating factor that the relationship between defendant and victim was an extenuating circumstance.

I

Defendant pled guilty to uttering a forged instrument pursuant to a plea agreement and a Bill of Information which was signed by the prosecutor. Neither defendant nor his attorney signed the waiver of a Bill of Indictment attached to the Bill…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. McClure v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. BillingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. KelsoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API