Legal Opinion

Wise v. Decker

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Decided November 15, 1804PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit, for use and occupation. Plea in abatement, for variance between the writ and the amended declaration. General demurrer and joinder. The writ was sued out before the bankruptcy of McCrea. After the assignee was appointed he was admitted plaintiff, under the 13th section of the bankrupt law. The general demurrer to the plea was adjudged good, and respondeas ouster awarded.

Read the full summary

Assumpsit, for use and occupation. Plea in abatement, for variance between the writ and the amended declaration. General demurrer and joinder. The writ was sued out before the bankruptcy of McCrea. After the assignee was appointed he was admitted plaintiff, under the 13th section of the bankrupt law. The general demurrer to the plea was adjudged good, and respondeas ouster awarded. Plea, non assumpsit, and issue. prayed the court to instruct the jury that if, from the evidence, they should be of opinion that the agreement was for a year certain, at a certain price, the plaintiff was not…

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT

instructed the jury that, If they should be of opinion, from the evidence, that there was such an agreement, but that it was afterwards waived, and that the defendant promised to pay for the time he occupied, then the evidence would support the counts.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jenkins v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API