Legal Opinion

United States v. Artak Ovsepian

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 3, 2024No. 21-55515PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-55515 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cv- 07717-VAP v. ARTAK OVSEPIAN, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Argued and Submitted February 5, 2024 Pasadena, California Filed September 3, 2024 Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Michelle T. Friedland, and Jennifer Sung, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Wardlaw 2 USA V. OVSEPIAN SUMMARY *

28 U.S.C. § 2255

On remand from the Supreme Court for further consideration in light of Dubin v. United States,

599 U.S. 110

(2023)…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kirk-miles v. MyersDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  2. Martinez v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
  3. United States v. HenriksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
  4. United States v. James AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2026
  5. United States v. MotleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API