Legal Opinion

DeRosier v. Vierra

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1952No. Civ. 8017PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Plaintiff and respondent commenced an action against defendant and appellant, the complaint containing two counts: (1) for $1,688.80 as the reasonable value of work, labor and services in the nature of land planing, scraping, ripping and surveying, at the special instance and request of defendant; and (2) upon an open book account for the same amount.

Defendant filed an answer denying the material allegations of the complaint, and also filed a cross-complaint in which he alleged that plaintiff agreed to level a 52-acre tract of land for defendant in such a good workmanlike…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Juchert v. California Water Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Lloyd v. KleefischCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Moulin v. ColumbetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kuehn v. LowthianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. McCaffrey v. CroninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API