J. R. Watkins Co. v. Jordan

Opinion op the Coubt by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

In this action brought by the appellant against the appellees on a contract of guaranty and in which the plea was non est factum, the jury found for the appel-lees and this appeal results.

The grounds for reversal may be grouped under three heads: First, that the verdict is flagrantly against the evidence; secondly, error of the trial court in refusing to give a requested instruction, and, thirdly, error of the trial court in refusing to permit an amended petition to be filed. The suit was brought on a contract bearing date August 30, 1924, and…