Legal Opinion

Bright v. Bell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 12, 1906No. 16,194PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Ered Durieve King, Judge. Action by George L. Bright against Samuel; H. Bell and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

This suit was instituted in October, 1905. At that time the plaintiff was the owner of a tract of land in the city of New Orleans, known as “Oakland Park.” Plaintiff sued the defendants for $5,000 damages for maliciously cutting, trimming, shaping, and partially destroying a hedge on the-frontage of said property, said hedge consisting of a mixture of Cherokee roses and' ligustrum.

After pleading the general issue, the defendant Bell admitted that he, acting in; his capacity of Metairie road commissioner and likewise under the instructions of the-mayor of the city, trimmed the hedge in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bright v. BellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. Central Louisiana Electric CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Kendall v. People's Gas & Fuel Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Gibbs v. TourresLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API