Tinker National Bank v. Grassi
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
John P. Cohalan, Jr., J.
This action was tried before the court without a jury.
Plaintiff bank sued defendant, as maker, for defaulting on a 90-day promissory note for $3,000, dated March 13,1964. In his *887answer, defendant, by failing to deny, has admitted the debt. He does deny, however, that he owes the additional sum of $450, sued for, which represents an attorney’s fee of 15%; and claims that it is unconscionable and void as against public policy.
The note, as signed by defendant, reads in pertinent part that ‘ ‘ Each maker * * * agrees that if any attorney is used to enforce or collect this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bobrick v. Second National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- In re the Bank of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Bobrick v. . the Second National Bank of HobokenNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Franklin National Bank v. CapobiancoNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Silberstein v. MurdochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dziurak v. Chase Manhattan BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Jamaica Savings Bank v. HalimiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1974
- Vellaringattu v. CasoNassau County District Court · 1989
- In re the Estate of HollingerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1979