Legal Opinion

Village of Oakley v. Wilson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1931No. 5502PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

January. 6, 1925, the village trustees of Oakley initiated proceedings which, resulted in the issuance on the 14th of March of the same year, of municipal bonds for the purchase of a waterworks system. January 28, 1925, appellants commenced under C. S., sec. 4101, amended Session Laws 1921, page 258, chapter 111, proceedings to detach their farm, lands theretofore within the village boundaries, judgment of detachment being entered November 11th. The County Auditor did not charge on the tax-rolls against this property, which we” will refer to as the detached property, the municipal tax levied…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Babcock v. GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. State v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Beem v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State v. HolderIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State v. MalcomIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tway v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. LawlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Bagnoni v. KlemmCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Keyes v. Class" B" School Dist. No. 421Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Morgan v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API