Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Rebman & Clark

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 16, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Craig county in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiffs. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

We have here under review a judgment of the Circuit Court of Craig county in favor of Rebman and Clark against the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, the defendant below, rendered on demurrer to the evidence.

*72The material facts, which are undisputed, are these: On July 16, 1913, the plaintiffs delivered to the defendant at New Castle, Virginia, two carloads of lambs for shipment to Jersey City, New Jersey, under the “Uniform Live Stock Contract” (in force at that time, but since invalidated by the Cummins act of March 4, 1915, amending the interstate commerce act, which interdicts agreements…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. SteeleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  3. Dunham v. Western Union Telegraph Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API