Legal Opinion
In re Krontz
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 28, 1993No. Bankruptcy No. 92-32727PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD L. SPEER, Bankruptcy Judge.
This ease comes before the Court on a Motion by the Trustee to Impose Sanctions on Debtors’ Attorney, James Hitchcock, for Failure to Comply with Rules Providing for Discovery. The Court has reviewed the *685entire record of this matter. Based upon that review, and for the following reasons, Trustee’s Motion is Denied.
FACTS
Diane W. French, Attorney for Trustee, Bruce C. French (hereafter “Trustee”), filed a Motion For Sanctions against Attorney James Hitchcock (hereafter “Debtors’ Counsel”), for failure to cooperate in discovery. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kersh (David) v. Borden Chemical, Borden, Inc., Polar Foam, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Midwest Sportservice, Inc. v. AndreoliOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Andover Togs, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999