Legal Opinion

Paine v. Commissioner of the State Land Office

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Muskegon. (Russell, J.) Bill to correct erroneous description in deed and for other relief. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Mrs. Paine, the complainant, began this suit to secure the title to a 40-acre lot, which she claims under title derived from "William R. Bowes, trustee of what were popularly known as the.“Port Huron & Grand Haven Railway Lands.” The Bowes title and other titles having all been held invalid, the State of Michigan, under a title granted by act of Congress, passed an act on June 9, 1883, for the protection of Iona fide settlers and purchasers, allowing them to apply within six months after the act took effect to the Commissioner of the State Land Office, and prove their claims, and pay 10 cents…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Enos Coal Mining Co. v. SCHUCHARTIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  2. North American Ginseng Co. v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. In re MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Paine v. BoyntonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Bell v. Gaston, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Jefferson County1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API