Legal Opinion

Cocke v. Wilson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1931No. 29426PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

This is an action at law in which the appellee was the plaintiff and the appellant was the defendant. With the consent of his attorney, a judgment was entered against the appellant for something less than the amount sued for. On the day after the entry of this judgment the appellant filed a motion, praying that the judgment he set aside and the case tried on its merits, setting forth that the judgment was entered without his knowledge or authority to his attorney to agree thereto, and “that he has a meritorious defense to the claims and demands of the plaintiff.” The evidence introduced in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southwestern Surety Ins. v. TreadwayMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Planters' Lumber Co. v. SibleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Lee v. SpikesMississippi Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Turner v. TurnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Craft v. BurrowMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Hurst v. Gulf States Creosoting Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Alexander v. HylandMississippi Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API