Legal Opinion

Muntner v. Lane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 27, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for dental malpractice, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Di Paola, J.), dated November 29, 1984, which denied her motion for leave to serve an amended verified complaint and bill of particulars.

Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. Plaintiff’s amended verified complaint and bill of particulars are deemed served. Defendant’s time to answer the amended verified complaint is extended until 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry.

*703The instant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Caffaro v. TraynaNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Heitczman v. MuranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. T.R. America Chemicals, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.New York Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Torre v. CifarelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Sporn v. Sun Refining Marketing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API