Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Coffee

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1898Published

Transferred to supreme court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

This is an action by the city of St. Louis to recover the penalty for a violation of a city ordinance. Such an action is civil and not criminal. City of St. Louis v. Vert, 84 Mo. 204; Ex parte Hollwedell, 74 Mo. 395. There can be no question that the city of St. Louis is a political subdivision of the state. Riddle v. Brown, 37 Mo. App. 550; Freeman v. St. Louis Quarry Co., 30 Mo. App. 362. It follows that under the amendments to the constitution establishing and limiting the jurisdiction of this court, the jurisdiction of this appeal is lodged in the supreme court. The cause will…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex parte HollwedellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  2. City of St. Louis v. VertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. Freeman v. St. Louis Quarry Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Riddle v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API