Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Bell

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1925No. 2179PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

Action by Mingo Hicks, et al. to compel Ella Bell and her surety on bond, to pay the amount of $628.50 and 10% attorneys fees provided for under Act 225 of 1918.

Plaintiff obtained judgment against Ella Bell in the sum of $15.00 and recognition of a lien and privilege resulting from an attachment and garnishment on the sum of $628.50 which had been attached in the hands of the American Bank & Trust Company.

*564Ella Bell obtained an order of court under which these funds were released to her upon her giving bond as prescribed by law with F. A. Blanchard as her surety.

The writ of attachment was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carroll v. ChaffeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  2. State v. SchonhausenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
  3. Harris v. PeelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1865

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hutchinson Bros. v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. International Shoe Co. v. HendersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API