Legal Opinion

Vanlandingham v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 10, 1932No. 2669PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The trustees of common school district No. 8, of Midland county, entered into written contracts in due form with appellants, W. H. and Irene Vanlandingham, husband - and wife, employing the latter as teachers of the district school for the 1931-32- scholastic term. Appellee Hill, county judge and éx officio county superintendent of schools, declined to approve the contracts.' Appeals were prosecuted by appellants to the county school board, thence to the state superintendent, and thence to the state board of education. The county board, state superintendent, and state board all sustained the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. King v. GuerraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Arberry v. BeaversTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Sansom v. MercerTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Freiberg, Kline & Co. v. MagaleTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Burks v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Isbill v. StovallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Lewis v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Peevy v. CarlisleTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Moore Common School Dist. No. 2 of Frio County v. Frio County Board of School TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Carlile v. PeevyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API