Legal Opinion

Clark v. . Whitehurst

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Justice J., at February Term, 1915, of Beaufort. From a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Tbe complaint alleges tbat tbe defendant wrongfully took from tbe stables of tbe plaintiff a bay mule, tbe property of tbe plaintiff, without bis knowledge or consent, and drove him a distance unknown to tbe plaintiff, and so cruelly mistreated and abused said mule tbat be died, and this action is to recover tbe sum of $200, alleged to be tbe value of tbe mule.

At tbe trial tbe evidence for the plaintiff was that tbe defendant, who was in the employment of tbe plaintiff as an occasional laborer, took tbe mule in question from plaintiff’s stables at night, and drove her off without bis…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Suppiger v. GruazIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Grady v. SchweinlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Sawyer v. . WilkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Three States Lumber Co. v. BlanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  5. Bethea v. . McLennonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Collins v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Lacy v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Whitford v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Whitford v. LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Skipper v. . HargroveSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1791

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API