Legal Opinion

AstraZeneca UK Ltd. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 14, 2012No. 2010-1460, 2010-1461, 2010-1462, 2010-1463, 2010-1464, 2010-1465, 2010-1466, 2010-1467, 2010-1468, 2010-1469, 2010-1470, 2010-1471, 2010-1472, 2010-1473Published

1Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ IN RE ROSUVASTATIN CALCIUM PATENT LITIGATION __________________________ ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, IPR PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AND SHIONOGI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AUROBINDO PHARMA LIMITED, Defendant-Appellant, AND MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Defendant-Appellant, AND APOTEX CORP., Defendant-Appellant, AND COBALT PHARMACEUTICALS INC. AND COBALT LABORATORIES INC., Defendants-Appellants, AND SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., Defendant-Appellant, ASTRAZENECA v. AUROBINDO 2 AND TEVA…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API