Richman v. Security Savings & Loan Asso.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The theory of the complaint was an action for conversion for breach of a fiduciary duty. The relief demanded was an accounting for the profits made by defendant on the tax and insurance deposits.
Plaintiffs have filed a reply brief raising for the first time in this case the contention that the tax and insurance deposit provisions of the mortgage note violated sec. 138.04, Stats. Under this new theory, the plaintiffs assert the deposits are installment payments on the mortgage debts and the rates of interest paid by plaintiffs on the declining principal balances exceed the rates specified in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Younger v. Rosenow Paper & Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- McCullough v. BrandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by17 opinions
- Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Carpenter v. Suffolk Franklin Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Surrey Strathmore Corp. v. Dollar Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Buchanan v. Century Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.