Legal Opinion

Roy Smith v. Richard Brown

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 26, 2014No. 12-3731PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TINDER, Circuit Judge.

Roy A. Smith appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas petition, through which he seeks to set aside his Indiana criminal conviction due to allegedly ineffective assistance of counsel. Although we agree that it appears Smith’s counsel was particularly deficient, Smith has failed to demonstrate how his lawyer’s substandard effort prejudiced his case in light of the overwhelming evidence against him. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment.

I. Background

The incident underlying this appeal occurred on March 19, 2003, when Smith was already serving a 90-year…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Fednav International Ltd. v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Douglas Hicks v. Randall HeppCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Scott Schmidt v. Brian FosterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. Walker Whatley v. Dushan ZateckyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Laderian McGhee v. Michael DittmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  5. Polk v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API