Legal Opinion

Boyer v. Delaware Liquor Commission

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided June 30, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richards, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

Before the enactment of the Liquor Control Act (38 Del. La/ios, c. 18) there was no law in force in this State, authorizing the sale of alcoholic liquor, except for medicinal *227or sacramental purposes. Prior to that time the Klair Law prohibited the manufacture or sale of alcoholic liquor, and the Loose Law prohibited its possession or transportation.

When it became apparent to many persons, that the repeal of the Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was certain to take place, the Legislature of 1933 proceeded to clear the way…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Commonwealth v. PlaistedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Thomas v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Poynter v. WallingSuperior Court of Delaware · 1962
  2. State v. PutmanSuperior Court of Delaware · 1988
  3. Magwire v. Village of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  4. Ellis v. Di SabatinoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1962
  5. Seversky, Inc. v. Delaware Alcoholic Beverage Control CommissionSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API